Document Services

One clause or short document reviewed with a single adversarial instrument. Plain-English flag: what the risk is, why it's there, one suggested fix. Built for individuals before signing — not after a dispute has started.

A structured worksheet — not a custom engagement. The questions the instrument stack asks, simplified so a non-business person can pressure-test their own document. An on-ramp toward 0A or 1A for people who realise they want a second set of eyes.

One document section. One concern. One instrument set. The cleanest and most demonstrable finding from that scope, with proposed resolution language ready for direct insertion. Entry point for new clients or single high-stakes clauses.

Complete adversarial review of the full document using all applicable instruments. Every section tested. Every provision pressure-checked against every other. Full findings register, severity-tiered, with the document's own text as the only required evidence.

Maximum analytical pressure. Multiple independent passes with strict non-duplication enforcement. Cross-instrument convergence testing. Propagation analysis. Root-cause identification at the architectural level. For regulatory submissions, AI governance frameworks, and standards.

Independent validation pass. Same adversarial instruments as a Targeted Pass, but the deliverable is a certificate rather than a finding. If a Critical or High finding is surfaced instead of a clean pass, you receive the finding at no additional charge.

A Targeted Pass run on a draft document during its public comment window, with the finding structured for direct submission as a formal comment. Same adversarial method, different format — built to influence a document before it is finalised.

The right to display an "AionSystem Reviewed" seal on the public-facing version of a reviewed document, re-verified annually against the current instrument stack. Requires a current Clean Certificate as prerequisite. A re-verified standing mark, not a one-time historical record.

Multiple related documents submitted together, reviewed with shared context. 10% off combined base price for 2 related documents. 15% off for 3 or more. Applies to 1B and 1C base prices only — page-band and other add-ons unaffected.

A purpose-built analytical framework from scratch — scope definition, instrument architecture, scoring methodology, epistemic tagging protocol, versioning structure. Up to 5 core instruments, fully specified, delivered as a deployable framework document the client owns outright.

Adversarial structural review of an existing framework or internal review process. Does it detect what it claims to detect? Does it have coverage gaps? Does it self-validate in ways that undermine its findings? Same method applied to documents, now applied to the framework itself.

Take an existing framework through a structured self-scan and produce a resolved next version with a complete changelog. How AionSystem manages its own stack: every version increment is a discrete deliverable with numbered findings, explicit resolutions, and a versioned document replacing the prior.

A live session teaching a client's internal team the adversarial structural thinking process — not the proprietary instruments, but the transferable discipline: how to pressure-test a document against itself, distinguish surface findings from structural ones, apply epistemic tagging.

A single scheduled paid analytical session. Scoping, interpreting findings, discussing framework design options, or any direct question requiring analytical engagement. No free discovery calls for individual clients. The output is useful regardless of whether a further engagement follows.

Priority access and a recurring structured review cadence. One Targeted Pass per month applied to any document. Priority scheduling on all services (5-day turnaround reduction). Quarterly framework health check. Minimum 3-month commitment. Cancel anytime after with 30 days notice.

Recurring delta scans against an established baseline. AI capability advances after delivery. New exploitation techniques surface. The document gets amended. Each of these can reopen a gap that was correctly closed at review time. No permanent-safety claim — ongoing vigilance instead.

Guarantee a future queue slot for a specific month, independent of which specific service will ultimately be booked. $1,500 credited in full against the eventual engagement invoice. Maximum 2 concurrent reservations — a genuine reservation on scarce capacity, not a refundable deposit.

For disputes, arbitrations, or regulatory proceedings where the structural integrity of a governance document is at issue. A written technical declaration describing the finding, the method, and the confidence basis — produced by an independent expert. Technical opinion, not legal opinion.

Structural comparison of a client's framework against a competitor's published equivalent. Where does the competitor's framework have coverage gaps yours addresses? Where does yours have gaps theirs reveals? Structural, not evaluative. Publicly published frameworks only.

For organisations publishing or adopting a new AI governance framework, model policy, or AI-specific standard. Includes: Comprehensive Adversarial Review (1C) + Adversarial Methodology Workshop (half-day) + Certified Mark License (first year). Maximum scrutiny plus internal capability and external signal.

For clients building a new internal analytical framework from scratch — built, taught, and immediately put through its first version cycle. Includes: Framework Design (2A base) + 90-minute training/onboarding + First version self-scan. Solves the assembly problem.